Crypto Fees review

Crypto Fees

Crypto Fees

CryptoFees.info Review – Should You Use It in 2025?

CryptoFees.info offers live visibility into how much users pay across blockchains and DeFi apps—think Ethereum, Bitcoin, Uniswap, Aave, and many more. It tracks daily and weekly fee volumes to spotlight real economic activity :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.

What Makes CryptoFees.info Unique?

  • Layer‑1 & Protocol Fees – Includes both blockchain and application‑level fees (e.g., DEXs, lending protocols) :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}.
  • Updated Daily – Data refreshes at 2 AM UTC every day :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}.
  • Historical Charts – View daily/monthly trends going back to 2021, like Ethereum’s $117 M fee peak in May 2021 :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}.
  • Open‑Source Backing – Developed by CryptoStats as a community resource; code available on GitHub :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}.

Reliability & Transparency

CryptoFees.info sources data from CoinMetrics for blockchains and The Graph subgraphs for dApps, ensuring credible coverage :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}. It functions entirely as a free, community-powered tool with donations via Gitcoin :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}.

User Experience & Interface

The site delivers a no-frills, table‑focused UI—sorted by fee volume and filterable by timeframe. It’s fast, mobile-friendly, and emphasizes raw data over flashy visualizations. Developers can connect via API or browse the FAQ section easily :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}.

Practical Use Cases

  • Track network adoption: High fees hint at strong usage (e.g., Ethereum vs Polygon).
  • Compare protocols: See which DeFi dApps command real revenue—e.g., Uniswap vs Aave :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}.
  • Historical context: Analyze how fee activity evolves post‑ETH upgrades or bull markets.

Limitations to Know

  • No fee‑per‑tx breakdown: CryptoFees.info reports total volume only :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}.
  • Limited analytics: Lacks charts like fee per user or gas depth.
  • Data gaps: Less common protocols may miss coverage until someone submits an adapter :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}.

How It Compares to Others

  • Vs l2fees.info: Focuses on Layer-2 only; CryptoFees covers both L1 + apps :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}.
  • Vs fee-per-transaction sites: CryptoFees deliberately sidesteps those metrics, arguing not all transactions are equal :contentReference[oaicite:13]{index=13}.
  • Vs paid analytics suites: Competing dashboards cost hundreds/month; CryptoFees is fully free.

Who Should Use CryptoFees.info?

  • DeFi analysts validating protocol activity.
  • Developers building metrics-backed tools.
  • Crypto reporters seeking fee-volume trends.
  • Casual users curious which networks hold real usage value.

Conclusion

CryptoFees.info shines as a lightweight, transparent resource for tracking real crypto network activity via fee volume. It stands out in 2025 as a reliable, open-source tool—but it’s not a deep analytics platform. Excellent for trend spotting, historical inspection, and community-powered insights. Just don’t expect per-transaction data or advanced visualizations.

FAQs

Does it show fee per transaction?

No—the platform reports total fee volume, not per‑tx averages :contentReference[oaicite:14]{index=14}.

Where does data come from?

CoinMetrics (for blockchains) and Graph subgraphs (for dApps) :contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}.

Is it trustworthy?

Yes—open-source, community-funded, no paywall, and backed by CryptoStats :contentReference[oaicite:16]{index=16}.

How frequently is data updated?

Daily at 2 AM UTC :contentReference[oaicite:17]{index=17}.

Can I add a protocol?

Yes—via the request project page and adapter contributions :contentReference[oaicite:18]{index=18}.

Explore more crypto data tools on 2CryptoGuys.com and check our CoinGecko analysis here.

Pros:
  • Free
  • Open-source
  • L1+app fees
  • API access
  • Mobile Support
Cons:
  • No tx fee chart
  • Minimal visuals
  • Some protocol gaps